نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری تاریخ و فلسفه علم دانشگاه تهران و دبیر فیزیک در اموزش و پرورش
2 دانشیار تاریخ و فلسفه علم، پژوهشکده تاریخ علم دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Abstract: Experimental sciences, especially physics, are among the most significant achievements of humanity. However, few people are aware of the actual mechanisms of science and the way scientific activities are conducted. One reason for this lack of awareness is the insufficient attention to the "nature of science" in the curriculum and science education. This paper addresses the topic of the nature of science and the appropriate method for presenting and teaching it, particularly in physics lessons. Presenting the nature of science through several components has become a standard approach known as the consensus approach. However, this approach has faced criticism and shortcomings. In response, the family resemblance approach has been proposed. Given these two important approaches, the question arises: What is the appropriate method for teaching the nature of science in physics? The article discusses the drawbacks and advantages of both the consensus and family resemblance approaches. We conclude that despite the comprehensiveness of the family resemblance approach, its complexities make its implementation in high school challenging. Therefore, to achieve better and more coherent teaching of the nature of science in physics, the component-based approach should still be utilized. Suitable additional components should be added to address the shortcomings of the consensus approach and insights of the family resemblance approach. Furthermore, to better integrate these components into the educational content, a proposal titled "Each Chapter, Several Components" is suggested.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)